Proprietas
All posts
Published 22 June 2026 in Product · 7 min read

Planon Alternative (UK): Modern, AI-First CAFM

Proprietas

The legacy CAFM and IWMS platforms — Planon, MRI Evolution (formerly Concept Evolution), Concerto, QFM, Asckey — were built for a different era of estate management: large implementation projects, on-site servers, per-seat licences and a consultant on speed-dial. They are powerful and they are proven. They are also slow to stand up, priced behind a sales call, and built before phones and AI changed what the boring half of the job costs. This is why UK estates teams now look for an alternative, and what to judge one on.

Here's the TL;DR
  • The incumbents win on breadth and lose on speed, cost and onboarding. Planon and MRI Evolution are deep IWMS suites; the trade-off is multi-month implementations, quote-based pricing and interfaces designed for a desktop and a trained administrator.
  • A modern alternative should be evaluated from liability first — does it track every statutory regime per building, prove condition to an inspector, and put unlimited contractors on their phones — not from feature-count.
  • Published pricing and fast onboarding are the real differentiators, not a longer module list. If you can't see the price or be live this week, that's the cost talking.
  • Match the tool to the estate. Capital-projects modelling, desk booking and deep space management are IWMS territory; if your problem is compliance, leases and facilities across many buildings, an AI-first tool is lighter and cheaper.

Why teams look past the incumbents

The legacy platforms share a shape, and it's the shape that drives the search for an alternative:

  • Implementation is a project, not a sign-up. Standing up a traditional CAFM/IWMS deployment is measured in months — data migration, configuration, training, a statement of work. For a multi-academy trust or a care group that needs deadlines tracked now, that's a long time exposed.
  • Pricing lives behind a sales call. Quote-based, per-module, per-seat. You can't compare on a Tuesday afternoon, and the contractor and tenant seats you need most are often the ones that count against the licence.
  • The interface assumes a trained administrator at a desk. These tools predate the mobile-first expectation. The contractor in a plant room and the caretaker logging a fault are the people who actually feed the system, and they live on phones.
  • The expensive, boring work is still manual. Reading a certificate, finding the expiry, pulling lease dates out of a PDF — the incumbents largely leave this to a person. That's exactly the work AI now does in seconds, if it's done honestly.

None of this means the incumbents are wrong. For a national portfolio that needs capital-projects modelling, space planning and a deep asset hierarchy, an IWMS earns its weight. The mismatch shows up when a leaner estate buys a suite built for a much heavier one.

The main incumbents, briefly

A fair, plain read of who you're likely comparing against:

  • Planon — a full IWMS, strong on space, assets and workplace, aimed at large corporate and institutional estates. Broad and capable; heavy to deploy and priced for the enterprise.
  • MRI Evolution (formerly Concept Evolution) — a long-established CAFM platform now under MRI Software, strong on work orders, PPM and the helpdesk. Mature, deep, and configuration-led.
  • Concerto — UK estates and asset-management software with a public-sector footprint (NHS, local authorities, education), strong on property and project data.
  • QFM (Service Works) — CAFM and workplace management with solid maintenance and SLA tooling, common in larger FM operations.
  • Asckey (fmfirst) — UK CAFM with an NHS/estates following, focused on compliance and helpdesk.

If you searched "Planon alternative" or "MRI Evolution alternative," you're usually not rejecting the category — you're looking for the same outcomes without the implementation project and the quote.

What to evaluate an alternative on

Estate management software carries personal liability for the people running it, so the evaluation should start where the exposure is — not with a feature matrix.

  1. Statutory compliance, per building. Does it track every regime — FRA, gas, EICR, legionella/L8, asbestos, EPC, LOLER and the rest — with a computed next-due date and a pre-expiry workflow, not a spreadsheet of dates? Our complete UK compliance guide maps the full set.
  2. Proof, not just status. Can it show an inspector or funder the certificate, who filed it, and when — an audit trail on every change? Compliance you can't evidence isn't compliance.
  3. Unlimited contractor and tenant access. The people who feed the system shouldn't cost per seat. If contractor logins count against a licence, the data goes stale.
  4. Onboarding measured in days. You should be tracking real deadlines this week, not after a migration project.
  5. Published pricing. You should be able to see what it costs without a call. (Ours is on the pricing page.)
  6. UK/EU hosting and a clear data story — where the data lives, how long it's kept, and how a tenant erasure is handled.
  7. AI that's honest. If the tool reads certificates and leases, it should cite the page, cache results so you never re-pay for the same document, and route low-confidence statutory dates to a human rather than auto-filing them. The AI estate management guide covers what "honest AI" means here.

Where Proprietas fits

Proprietas is the AI-first alternative for the estate whose problem is compliance, leases and facilities across many buildings — multi-academy trusts, care and hotel groups, managing agents, and public-sector estates — rather than capital-projects modelling for a national corporate portfolio.

What that looks like in practice:

  • Statutory compliance is the spine. Every building × regime produces a tracked obligation with a computed next-due date and a 90/60/30/7-day pre-expiry workflow. Drop a certificate on the free scanner and the dates, type and reference pull out — page-cited — and that's the same engine that files it.
  • Lease intelligence built in. Term dates, breaks, rent reviews and service-charge caps extracted from the PDFs, with the page citation, instead of a person reading deeds.
  • Unlimited contractors and tenants, free at every tier. Seat caps apply to your estates staff, never to the people on phones in the field.
  • Published pricing and 10-minute onboarding. Three tiers, on the website — no sales call to see the number, no implementation project to get value.
  • An audit trail on every write, UK/EU hosting, and a confidence threshold that keeps statutory dates from being auto-filed when the AI isn't sure.

And the honest boundary: Proprietas deliberately does not do desk booking, capital-projects management, IoT/BMS integration or deep space planning. If those are your core requirement, a full IWMS like Planon is the right tool and we'll say so. If your exposure is the buildings stay compliant, the leases don't surprise you, and the contractors actually show up, that's the job we're built for — and it's where the legacy suites are heaviest and slowest.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a UK alternative to Planon? Yes — several, depending on what you need. For deep IWMS breadth, MRI Evolution, Concerto and QFM are the usual comparisons. For a modern, AI-first tool focused on statutory compliance, leases and facilities with published pricing and fast onboarding, Proprietas is built for UK estates teams specifically.

What's the difference between MRI Evolution and Concept Evolution? They're the same lineage — Concept Evolution is the original CAFM product; it now sits within MRI Software's portfolio as MRI Evolution. If you're evaluating "Concept Evolution," you're looking at MRI Evolution today.

Do I have to replace my whole CAFM to switch? No. Because compliance is the spine and onboarding is measured in days, most teams start by getting their statutory deadlines and certificates into one tracked register first — the highest-liability slice — and bring leases and facilities across from there.

Can I see the price without a sales call? Yes. Pricing is published: three tiers, with unlimited contractor and tenant access at every one. That's the point — you shouldn't need a quote to find out what compliance software costs.


Choosing an alternative to a legacy CAFM/IWMS isn't about matching module for module — it's about matching the tool to the estate. If the job is keeping many buildings compliant, the leases legible and the contractors moving, the modern, AI-first option is lighter, faster to stand up, and priced in the open. See the side-by-side alternatives breakdown, try it on a real certificate, or check the pricing.

This is a general comparison for evaluation, not an endorsement or criticism of any specific product — capabilities, pricing and positioning of all the tools named here change; always confirm current details with each vendor.

Estates, but on autopilot.

Drop in a certificate and Proprietas reads the dates, files it to the right property, and tracks every statutory deadline — so nothing slips and you're never the one exposed.

Planon Alternative (UK): Modern, AI-First CAFM | Proprietas